Claims

A practice article reports that the studies it cites found better post-test outcomes from words with relevant pictures than from words alone, especially with spoken words

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on a source with no registered publication record (a web page, book or unpublished report). It is kept because 4 design pages cite it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Studies cited by the article demonstrated improved post-test learning outcomes when both words and pictures were presented instead of words alone, with Herrlinger et al. (2017) finding learning improved especially when words were delivered orally. → Marjorie Ceballos 2022

Evidence

Ceballos & Nutta 2022

Ceballos, M., & Nutta, J. W. (2022). Emergent bilinguals and multimedia instructional design: Applying the science of learning principles to dual language instruction. Education Leadership Review, 23(1). ERIC EJ1380081

q2 · i? · review · r2

A practice-to-theory article (the authors' own term), not a review of its own: it reports improved post-test outcomes for the multimedia principle (Frumuselu et al., 2015; Issa et al., 2013) and the Herrlinger et al. (2017) biology-text finding quoted here. No effect sizes printed.

"Herrlinger et al. (2017) found that learning improved when learners were presented with a biology text that used both words and pictures, particularly when words were delivered orally."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id multimedia-principle-words-and-pictures-outcomes
title A practice article reports that the studies it cites found better post-test outcomes from words with relevant pictures than from words alone, especially with spoken words
description A practice article reports that the studies it cites found better post-test outcomes from words with relevant pictures than from words alone, especially with spoken words
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — ceballos-nutta-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.