A practice article reports that the studies it cites found better post-test outcomes from words with relevant pictures than from words alone, especially with spoken words¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on a source with no registered publication record (a web page, book or unpublished report). It is kept because 4 design pages cite it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Studies cited by the article demonstrated improved post-test learning outcomes when both words and pictures were presented instead of words alone, with Herrlinger et al. (2017) finding learning improved especially when words were delivered orally. → Marjorie Ceballos 2022
Evidence¶
Ceballos & Nutta 2022¶
Ceballos, M., & Nutta, J. W. (2022). Emergent bilinguals and multimedia instructional design: Applying the science of learning principles to dual language instruction. Education Leadership Review, 23(1). ERIC EJ1380081
q2 · i? · review · r2
A practice-to-theory article (the authors' own term), not a review of its own: it reports improved post-test outcomes for the multimedia principle (Frumuselu et al., 2015; Issa et al., 2013) and the Herrlinger et al. (2017) biology-text finding quoted here. No effect sizes printed.
"Herrlinger et al. (2017) found that learning improved when learners were presented with a biology text that used both words and pictures, particularly when words were delivered orally."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Oral Language — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Multimedia Principle Improves Learning — related
- Adding relevant pictures or graphics to text improves learning from it, with a small pooled effect on reading comprehension, though whether dual coding explains the benefit is disputed — related
- In one 37-student classroom experiment, recall and retention differ across media combinations in the direction Dual Coding Theory predicts — related
- Multimedia Principles Benefit Novices — related
- On-screen text that duplicates the narration of a diagram can hurt learning, but spoken–written redundancy is not harmful on average and helps over spoken-only presentation in some conditions — related
- Congruent pictures paired with text facilitate reading comprehension better than text alone or pictures alone — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Presenting words as spoken narration rather than on-screen text alongside graphics improves learning — related
- Voice-based multimedia settings (animation+voice and picture+voice) produce better learning performance than picture+text — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
multimedia-principle-words-and-pictures-outcomes |
title |
A practice article reports that the studies it cites found better post-test outcomes from words with relevant pictures than from words alone, especially with spoken words |
description |
A practice article reports that the studies it cites found better post-test outcomes from words with relevant pictures than from words alone, especially with spoken words |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — ceballos-nutta-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.