Claims

Imagery and perceptual illusions each comprise multiple factors rather than the single CHC factors

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Factor analysis identified three unique imagery factors — imagery quality, imagery speed and imagery self-report — where the CHC theory represents imagery as a single factor. → Jeffrey Buckley 2018 q2 i? Individuals differ both in the degree they are affected by visual illusions and in which illusions affect them, supporting five illusion factors. → Jeffrey Buckley 2018 (2)

Evidence

Jeffrey Buckley 2018

Jeffrey Buckley, Niall Seery, Donal Canty. (2018). A Heuristic Framework of Spatial Ability: a Review and Synthesis of Spatial Factor Literature to Support its Translation into STEM Education. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9432-z

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports an extensive factor-analytic study following Carroll's recommendation, in which "Burton and Fogarty (2003) identified three unique imagery factors"; the self-report factor is described as a measure of belief of capacity, not an objective measure of the imagery factor.

"Burton and Fogarty (2003) identified three unique imagery factors which they posited as imagery quality, imagery speed and imagery self-report."

Jeffrey Buckley 2018 (2)

Jeffrey Buckley, Niall Seery, Donal Canty. (2018). A Heuristic Framework of Spatial Ability: a Review and Synthesis of Spatial Factor Literature to Support its Translation into STEM Education. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9432-z

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports Coren et al.'s factor-analytic results, which Carroll described as a major factor-analytic study, supporting five individual illusion factors based on valid measures built from illusion geometry and behavioural effects.

"The findings suggest that individuals differ not only in the degree they are affected by visual illusions but also by which illusions affect them and include shape and direction illusions, size contrast illusions, overestimation illusions, underestimation illusions and frame of reference illusions."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id multiple-imagery-and-illusion-factors
title Imagery and perceptual illusions each comprise multiple factors rather than the single CHC factors
description Imagery and perceptual illusions each comprise multiple factors rather than the single CHC factors
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2018
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-20
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — jeffrey-buckley-2018, jeffrey-buckley-2018-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.