Multiple sources of student information can be accumulated to estimate teacher effectiveness¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoreticalr?·q1
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? The volume addresses how multiple sources of student information could be accumulated to estimate teacher effectiveness. → The effective use of student and school descriptive indicators of learning progress: From the conditional growth index to the learning productivity measurement system 2015
Evidence¶
The effective use of student and school descriptive indicators of learning progress: From the conditional growth index to the learning productivity measurement system 2015¶
The effective use of student and school descriptive indicators of learning progress: From the conditional growth index to the learning productivity measurement system. (2015). Value Added Modeling and Growth Modeling with Particular Application to Teacher and School Effectiveness, 237–269. https://www.nwea.org/research/publication/the-effective-use-of-student-and-school-descriptive-indicators-of-learning-progress-from-the-conditional-growth-index-to-the-learning-productivity-measurement-system/ doi:10.1108/978-1-62396-776-5
q1 · i? · theoretical · r?
The abstract lists this among the questions the edited volume addresses, indicating that accumulating multiple sources of student information for estimating teacher effectiveness is treated as a live methodological topic. No method or result is printed in the available text.
"How multiple sources of student information could be accumulated to estimate teacher effectiveness?"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The volume addresses criteria for evaluating growth models and how outputs from growth models should be utilized — related
- The paper clarifies confusion about the use of value-added information in teacher evaluation — related
- Empirical Bayes shrinkage could be used to address bias in proxy pre-test value-added estimates — related
- Proxy pre-test value-added estimates show bias, but may still carry information about teacher effectiveness — related
- Bias, not precision loss, drives the difference in proxy pre-test value-added estimates — related
- The Teacher Team Method and Full Roster Method produce similar estimates of teacher value added — related
- The lower a test's score ceiling, the more teacher value-added estimates shrink toward the average teacher, because ceiling scores contain imprecise information about achievement — related
- Snedden argues school reports should inform the public, but available educational statistics cannot answer questions about the relative value of different studies — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
multiple-sources-accumulate-teacher-effectiveness |
title |
Multiple sources of student information can be accumulated to estimate teacher effectiveness |
description |
Multiple sources of student information can be accumulated to estimate teacher effectiveness |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2015 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — the-effective-use-of-student-and-school-descriptive-indicators-of-learning-progress-from-the-conditional-growth-index-to-the-learning-productivity-measurement-system-2015 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.