Claims

Students' performance scores on the MuTAT touch-based assessment tool are comparable to paper-and-pencil test scores

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Mean performance on MuTAT did not differ significantly from mean performance on the paper-and-pencil test, indicating the tool did not impede accuracy. → Adesina 2014

Evidence

Adesina 2014

Adesina, A., Stone, R., Batmaz, F., & Jones, I. (2014). Touch Arithmetic: A process‐based Computer‐Aided Assessment approach for capture of problem solving steps in the context of elementary mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.015

q2 · i? · design · r2

Observational within-participant study in which 39 Year 5 children solved word problems on MuTAT and similar symbolic problems on paper. Means were "comparable" (MuTAT M = 3.61, SD = 0.59; Paper M = 3.72, SD = 0.51); a paired t test found no significant difference (t(38) = 0.94, p = 0.35).

"This figure showed that the mean performances on the MuTAT software and paper are comparable (MuTAT‐> M = 3.61, SD=0.59; Paper ‐>M = 3.72, SD = 0.51)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id mutat-performance-comparable-to-paper-tests
title Students' performance scores on the MuTAT touch-based assessment tool are comparable to paper-and-pencil test scores
description Students' performance scores on the MuTAT touch-based assessment tool are comparable to paper-and-pencil test scores
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2014
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — adesina-2014

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.