Claims

Narrative theory instruction improved students' thematic concept scores for poster design

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group scored significantly higher than the control group on the thematic concept dimension (M 22.00 vs 20.93, F(1, 88) = 6.47, p = .017). → Chao-Ming Yang & Tzu-Fan Hsu 2017

Evidence

Chao-Ming Yang & Tzu-Fan Hsu 2017

Chao-Ming Yang & Tzu-Fan Hsu. (2017). New Perspective on Visual Communication Design Education: An Empirical Study of Applying Narrative Theory to Graphic Design Courses. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n2p188

q2 · i? · causal · r1

One-way ANOVA on the thematic concept dimension of posttest poster scores in the matched-group experiment (narrative theory group vs case-method control group). The difference reached "a significance level of .017 ( p < .05)". No effect size is printed.

"for thematic concept, a significance level of .017 ( p < .05) was reached between the groups with F(1, 88) = 6.47 (Mexperimental group = 22.00 > Mcontrol group = 20.93)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.