Claims

Natural-monument misconceptions (e.g., "It is the name used for mausoleums") were largely eliminated post-test, with 18 experimental and 12 control students reaching complete understanding

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Post-test, 18 experimental-group and 12 control-group students gave complete-understanding responses to the natural monument concept. → Tülay Şenel Çoruhlu & Sibel Er Nas 2017

Evidence

Tülay Şenel Çoruhlu & Sibel Er Nas 2017

Tülay Şenel Çoruhlu & Sibel Er Nas. (2017). The Impact of Guidance Materials on Students' Conceptual Understanding: The Case of "What Is the Earth's Crust Composed of?". Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i2.2169

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Concept-test frequency analysis (Table 3). Pre-test, 6 students in each group showed complete understanding and misconceptions converged on "It is the name used for mausoleums" and "It is the name referring to the remnants of the old"; post-test complete-understanding counts rose to 18 (experimental) and 12 (control).

"In the post-test, on the other hand, 18 students from the experimental group and 12 from the control group provided complete understanding responses to the question about the concept, noting "It is the name referring to the naturally occurring entities"."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.