Near-peer feedback improved clinical note scores compared to no feedback in one included study¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2·i1small
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i1 Second-year students receiving near-peer feedback outperformed no-feedback controls on history (d = 0.25) and physical exam (d = 1.0) scores. → Wilesmith Sarah 2025
Evidence¶
Wilesmith Sarah 2025¶
Wilesmith Sarah, Mandrusiak Allison, Lang Ray, Martin Romany, Lu Andric, Forbes Roma. (2025). Educational Interventions to Develop and Enhance Clinical Documentation Skills in Health Professional Students: A Systematic Review. The Clinical Teacher. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.70157
q2 · i1 · review · r2
Review reports Olvet et al. 2020 findings: "The 2nd year near-peer feedback group outperformed the no feedback group on history score (p = 0.03, d = 0.25) and physical exam score (p < 0.001, d = 1.0)."
"The 2nd year near-peer feedback group outperformed the no feedback group on history score (p = 0.03, d = 0.25) and physical exam score (p < 0.001, d = 1.0)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- In an RCT reviewed by this study, an LLM-based digital patient improved ophthalmology medical history-taking skills relative to control — related
- Multi-agent AI standardized patient training improved final OSCE-aligned examination scores compared with a structured non-LLM control condition — related
- AI-generated (GPT-4) feedback produced no greater linguistic progress than human tutor feedback among ENL students over six weeks — related
- Controlled GenAI virtual-patient and communication studies reported short-term skill gains, but positive findings were not universal — related
- Clearest LLM-teaching signals appear in settings with clearly defined tasks, immediate feedback, and repeated practice, such as simulated patients and structured feedback — related
- In an RCT reviewed here, adding AI-generated feedback to a GenAI virtual patient improved medical students' clinical decision-making relative to simulation alone — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.