Claims

Near-peer-led and instructor-led documentation workshops produced equivalent H&P and OSCE HPI scores

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2 · i0 negligible
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i0 Kusnoor et al. 2022 found no difference between faculty-facilitated and resident-facilitated workshop groups on written H&P or OSCE HPI scores. → Wilesmith Sarah 2025

Evidence

Wilesmith Sarah 2025

Wilesmith Sarah, Mandrusiak Allison, Lang Ray, Martin Romany, Lu Andric, Forbes Roma. (2025). Educational Interventions to Develop and Enhance Clinical Documentation Skills in Health Professional Students: A Systematic Review. The Clinical Teacher. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.70157

q2 · i0 · review · r3

Review reports Kusnoor et al. 2022 randomised parallel trial: "No difference between written H&P scores for students with faculty facilitators (mean, 29.3; SD, 1.5) vs. resident facilitators (mean, 29.3; SD, 2.3)."

"No difference between written H&P scores for students with faculty facilitators (mean, 29.3; SD, 1.5) vs. resident facilitators (mean, 29.3; SD, 2.3). No differences on OSCE HPI scores between groups (mean, 9; SD, 0.9)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.