The field's greatest need is an extensive experimental and critical study of the relative diagnostic value of available individual tests, followed by establishment of norms¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoreticalr?·q1
Currency · newest study 1917 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? An extensive experimental and critical study of the relative value for practical diagnosis of the many available individual tests is one of the greatest present needs in psychological diagnosis. → Lewis M. Terman and Clara Harbison Town 1917
q1 i? Once relative value is determined, norms must be established and the best method of arranging the norms or the tests determined, with open questions about selection criteria (correlation with social or educational criteria, elemental versus complex tests, eclectic versus systematic scales, administration time). → Lewis M. Terman and Clara Harbison Town 1917
Evidence¶
Lewis M. Terman and Clara Harbison Town 1917¶
Lewis M. Terman and Clara Harbison Town. (1917). Communications and Discussions, The Journal of Educational Psychology. https://www.jstor.org
q1 · i? · theoretical · r?
A symposium communication stating a research-agenda claim: after determining relative test value, the field must 'establish norms for these tests' and decide criteria such as correlation with child success, elemental versus complex tests, and whether the ideal scale should be eclectic. No data support it; it is an expert statement of need.
"One of the greatest needs at the present time in the field of psy chological diagnosis is an extensive experimental and critical study of the relative value for purposes of practical diagnosis of the larger number of individual tests which are now available."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Pre-service teachers' collaborative diagnostic accuracy does not per se exceed individual diagnostic accuracy, but collaboration support can significantly enhance the added value of collaborative diagnosis — related
- Pre-service teachers who received NLP-based adaptive feedback were better able to justify their diagnoses than those who received static feedback (reported from Sailer et al.) — related
- The editor predicts NRC group tests will make intelligence testing a routine school measure and open the way for adjusting school work to pupil needs — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
need-for-critical-study-of-test-relative-value-and-norms |
title |
The field's greatest need is an extensive experimental and critical study of the relative diagnostic value of available individual tests, followed by establishment of norms |
description |
The field's greatest need is an extensive experimental and critical study of the relative diagnostic value of available individual tests, followed by establishment of norms |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
1917 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — lewis-m-terman-and-clara-harbison-town-1917 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.