Claims

Needs-improvement messages, not positive messages, drove the credit-earning effect

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Students in the improvement information condition experienced an 8.8 percentage point increase in probability of earning course credit, while the positive information effect was not statistically significant. → Kraft and Rogers 2013

Evidence

Kraft and Rogers 2013

Matthew A. Kraft and Todd Rogers. (2013). Teacher-to-Parent Communication: Experimental Evidence from a Low-Cost Communication Policy. SREE Fall 2013 Conference Abstract. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED563011

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Separate ITT estimates by treatment arm from the same blocked randomized field trial. The improvement information effect was "8.8 percentage point (p=0.016)"; the positive information effect was 4.5 percentage points (p=0.236), not significant.

"the large positive effect of communication is driven by students in the improvement information condition who experienced an 8.8 percentage point (p=0.016) increase in their probability of earning course credit"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.