Claims

Effort ratings correlate negatively with judgments of learning (r = −0.355), but the correlation disappears under a goal-driven interpretation of effort

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r2 · q2–q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 Across studies, learners' effort ratings correlate negatively with judgments of their learning during a learning task (r = −0.355), consistent with a data-driven easily-learned-easily-remembered heuristic. → Anique B. H. de Bruin 2023 q2 i? In the subset of studies where learners adopted a goal-driven interpretation of effort, no negative correlation between effort and learning was observed; this approach is less common than the data-driven approach. → Anique B. H. de Bruin 2023 (2)

Evidence

Anique B. H. de Bruin 2023

Anique B. H. de Bruin, Felicitas Biwer, Luotong Hui, Erdem Onan, Louise David, Wisnu Wiradhany. (2023). Worth the Effort: the Start and Stick to Desirable Difficulties (S2D2) Framework. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09766-w

q3 · i2 · review · r2

Meta-analytic synthesis reported in the review: the correlation was "weaker for prospective than for retrospective judgments, and stronger for problem-solving than for paired associates tasks."

"a recent meta-analysis (Baars et al., 2020) revealed that learners' effort ratings correlate negatively with judgments of their learning when engaging in a learning task (r = − 0.355)."

Anique B. H. de Bruin 2023 (2)

Anique B. H. de Bruin, Felicitas Biwer, Luotong Hui, Erdem Onan, Louise David, Wisnu Wiradhany. (2023). Worth the Effort: the Start and Stick to Desirable Difficulties (S2D2) Framework. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09766-w

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports this moderator from the same meta-analysis: under goal-driven interpretation, higher effort leads to higher perceived learning and more use of desirable difficulties; the article notes this approach is less common among learners.

"the subset of studies where learners adopted a goal-driven interpretation of effort showed no negative correlation between effort and learning."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id negative-effort-jol-correlation-meta-analysis
title Effort ratings correlate negatively with judgments of learning (r = −0.355), but the correlation disappears under a goal-driven interpretation of effort
description Effort ratings correlate negatively with judgments of learning (r = −0.355), but the correlation disappears under a goal-driven interpretation of effort
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — anique-b-h-de-bruin-2023, anique-b-h-de-bruin-2023-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.