Claims

Head-to-head comparison exposes a security-usability-latency tension: NeMo reaches 0% bypass at 16.22% FPR and ~1.5 s latency while Prompt Guard yields 38.48% bypass at 3.60% FPR

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? On the identical holdout split, NeMo Guardrails achieves 0% bypass but a 16.22% false positive rate and over 1.4 seconds average latency, while Prompt Guard reduces bypass to 38.48% with a 3.60% FPR. → Alexandre Cristovão Maiorano 2026

Evidence

Alexandre Cristovão Maiorano 2026

Alexandre Cristovão Maiorano. (2026). Evaluating Prompt Injection Defenses for Educational LLM Tutors: Security-Usability-Latency Trade-offs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06669 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.06669

q2 · i? · design · r2

Direct head-to-head evaluation of external adapters on the identical 480-query holdout split with unified latency instrumentation. The quote names NeMo's trade-off; Prompt Guard "offers a mid-point, reducing bypass to 38.48% but still suffering a 3.60% FPR." Both were threshold- or rail-configured on a stratified calibration split.

"NeMo Guardrails achieves a perfect 0% bypass rate, but at the cost of a prohibitive 16.22% false positive rate and extreme latency delays (over 1.4 seconds on average, p95 above 4 seconds)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id nemo-prompt-guard-tradeoff-holdout
title Head-to-head comparison exposes a security-usability-latency tension: NeMo reaches 0% bypass at 16.22% FPR and ~1.5 s latency while Prompt Guard yields 38.48% bypass at 3.60% FPR
description Head-to-head comparison exposes a security-usability-latency tension: NeMo reaches 0% bypass at 16.22% FPR and ~1.5 s latency while Prompt Guard yields 38.48% bypass at 3.60% FPR
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
recheck_by 2029
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — alexandre-cristovão-maiorano-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.