Claims

Netherlands case: design-based TPACK interventions improved student teachers' TPACK and were sustained, but scaling was delayed by leadership decision structures

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · design r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Design-based research interventions in an English literature course and a graduate technology integration course improved student teachers' TPACK and pedagogical reasoning, though will to use technology depended on beliefs about education. → Howard 2021 q2 i? Scaling of the sustained practices was delayed because unclear decision structures prevented leadership from reaching a final decision, and budget cuts led to the plan being dropped. → Howard 2021 (2)

Evidence

Howard 2021

Howard, S. K., Schrum, L., Voogt, J., & Sligte, H. (2021). Designing research to inform sustainability and scalability of digital technology innovations. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09913-y

q2 · i? · design · r3

Case study of two interventions in a Dutch Teacher Education College, designed and investigated through iterative design-based research from 2016 to 2019. The multimedia-production task was retained in the course, making it a sustainable practice.

"Research results showed that student teachers' TPACK improved, as did their pedagogical reasoning. However, the will to use technology and pedagogical reasoning about technology depended on beliefs about education (Smits et al. 2019a)."

Howard 2021 (2)

Howard, S. K., Schrum, L., Voogt, J., & Sligte, H. (2021). Designing research to inform sustainability and scalability of digital technology innovations. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09913-y

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Case description of the 2019 scaling plan to support technology use across discipline-based teams of teacher educators; despite positive reception the plan was not implemented until COVID-19 closures changed the situation.

"Unclear decision structures in the College resulted in leadership not arriving at a final decision about the plan. When the College was faced with extra budget cuts the plan was then easily dropped, as primary tasks were prioritized."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id netherlands-tpack-interventions-sustained-scaling-delayed
title Netherlands case: design-based TPACK interventions improved student teachers' TPACK and were sustained, but scaling was delayed by leadership decision structures
description Netherlands case: design-based TPACK interventions improved student teachers' TPACK and were sustained, but scaling was delayed by leadership decision structures
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — howard-2021, howard-2021-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.