Claims

Neuroticism is negatively correlated with all annotation activity features

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i2 Neuroticism scores correlate negatively with all six annotation features (e.g., TNAA r = −0.287). → Omheni 2017

Evidence

Omheni 2017

Omheni, N., Kalboussi, A., Mazhoud, O., & Hadj Kacem, A. (2017). Computing of Learner’s Personality Traits Based on Digital Annotations. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 27, 241-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0124-x

q2 · i2 · associational · r1

Correlational study of 120 volunteers; Table 1 reports Pearson correlations such as TNAA r = −0.287 with neuroticism, significant at p < 0.05.

"Neuroticism is negatively correlated with all the features of annotation activity (e.g. Fig. 4). Here, the sample size is sufficient to have significant correlations for all the annotation features."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id neuroticism-negatively-correlated-annotation-features
title Neuroticism is negatively correlated with all annotation activity features
description Neuroticism is negatively correlated with all annotation activity features
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2017
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — omheni-2017

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.