Claims

New and old fit statistics are moderately correlated, with Pearson coefficients mostly between 0.50 and 0.79

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2022: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? All but one Pearson correlation between new and old infit/outfit statistics fell between 0.50 and 0.79 (the exception, AllYr Mathematics outfit, was 0.81). → He 2019

Evidence

He 2019

He, W. (2019). MAP Growth K–2 item fit analysis study. NWEA. https://www.nwea.org/research/publication/map-growth-k-2-item-fit-analysis-study/

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Pearson correlations in Table 2.1 between new and old infit and outfit statistics for both samples; values range from 0.53 (AllYr Reading infit) to 0.81 (AllYr Mathematics outfit), described as "moderately correlated."

"All coefficients but one are between 0.50 and 0.79, suggesting that the new and old fit statistics are moderately correlated."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id new-old-fit-statistics-moderately-correlated
title New and old fit statistics are moderately correlated, with Pearson coefficients mostly between 0.50 and 0.79
description New and old fit statistics are moderately correlated, with Pearson coefficients mostly between 0.50 and 0.79
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2019
recheck_by 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — he-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.