Claims

The program showed no significant overall math difference, though items on visual-spatial vocabulary and nonstandard measurement improved for the treatment condition

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 2 studies · 2 causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · checked against its sources 2026-10-18 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Analyses of math data showed no significant difference overall between intervention and comparison children. → math-null-1 q2 i? A few items measuring visual spatial vocabulary and nonstandard measurement showed significant improvement for treatment children relative to comparison children. → math-items-1

Evidence

math-null-1

Dominguez, X., Vidiksis, R., Leones, T., Kamdar, D., Presser, A., Bueno, M., & Orr, J. (2023, April). Integrating science, mathematics, and engineering: Linking home and school learning for young learners. Digital Promise. https://doi.org/10.51388/20.500.12265/180

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Regression analyses of the study's custom 19-item math assessment (measurement, visual and spatial thinking, comparison of quantity) found no significant overall difference between conditions; equivalence was not tested.

"Results from the analyses of math data show no significant difference overall."

math-items-1

Dominguez, X., Vidiksis, R., Leones, T., Kamdar, D., Presser, A., Bueno, M., & Orr, J. (2023, April). Integrating science, mathematics, and engineering: Linking home and school learning for young learners. Digital Promise. https://doi.org/10.51388/20.500.12265/180

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Item-level analyses of the math assessment in the same field study. The report states items measuring "visual spatial vocabulary and nonstandard measurement" showed significant improvement for treatment children, though total scores showed no significant difference.

"Although no statistically significant difference was evident using total scores, a few items (measuring visual spatial vocabulary and nonstandard measurement, which are less often promoted in preschool relative to counting) showed significant improvement for children in the treatment condition, relative to children in the comparison condition."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id nico-nor-math-null-with-item-gains
title The program showed no significant overall math difference, though items on visual-spatial vocabulary and nonstandard measurement improved for the treatment condition
description The program showed no significant overall math difference, though items on visual-spatial vocabulary and nonstandard measurement improved for the treatment condition
status review
evidence_strength mixed
newest_evidence 2023
source_checked 2026-10-18
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — math-null-1, math-items-1

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.