The program showed no significant overall math difference, though items on visual-spatial vocabulary and nonstandard measurement improved for the treatment condition¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 2 studies · 2 causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · checked against its sources 2026-10-18 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Analyses of math data showed no significant difference overall between intervention and comparison children. → math-null-1
q2 i? A few items measuring visual spatial vocabulary and nonstandard measurement showed significant improvement for treatment children relative to comparison children. → math-items-1
Evidence¶
math-null-1¶
Dominguez, X., Vidiksis, R., Leones, T., Kamdar, D., Presser, A., Bueno, M., & Orr, J. (2023, April). Integrating science, mathematics, and engineering: Linking home and school learning for young learners. Digital Promise. https://doi.org/10.51388/20.500.12265/180
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Regression analyses of the study's custom 19-item math assessment (measurement, visual and spatial thinking, comparison of quantity) found no significant overall difference between conditions; equivalence was not tested.
"Results from the analyses of math data show no significant difference overall."
math-items-1¶
Dominguez, X., Vidiksis, R., Leones, T., Kamdar, D., Presser, A., Bueno, M., & Orr, J. (2023, April). Integrating science, mathematics, and engineering: Linking home and school learning for young learners. Digital Promise. https://doi.org/10.51388/20.500.12265/180
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Item-level analyses of the math assessment in the same field study. The report states items measuring "visual spatial vocabulary and nonstandard measurement" showed significant improvement for treatment children, though total scores showed no significant difference.
"Although no statistically significant difference was evident using total scores, a few items (measuring visual spatial vocabulary and nonstandard measurement, which are less often promoted in preschool relative to counting) showed significant improvement for children in the treatment condition, relative to children in the comparison condition."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Spatial Ability — outcome: instruction changes it
- Measurement — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Spatial Skills Improve Through Block Building — related
- Block Play Predicts Math Achievement — related
- The MSDS curriculum showed no statistically significant effects on word recognition, spelling, fluency, or comprehension outcomes — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
nico-nor-math-null-with-item-gains |
title |
The program showed no significant overall math difference, though items on visual-spatial vocabulary and nonstandard measurement improved for the treatment condition |
description |
The program showed no significant overall math difference, though items on visual-spatial vocabulary and nonstandard measurement improved for the treatment condition |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
mixed |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
source_checked |
2026-10-18 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — math-null-1, math-items-1 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.