Claims

Children without MD benefited from strategy conditions on operation span but not on solution or calculation accuracy

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Children without MD did not benefit from strategy conditions on solution and calculation accuracy but did benefit on the operation span measure. → Swanson et al. 2013

Evidence

Swanson et al. 2013

H. Lee Swanson, Michael J. Orosco, Cathy Lussier. (2013). Does Cognitive Strategy Training on Word Problems Compensate for Working Memory Capacity in Children with Math Difficulties? SREE Spring 2013 Conference. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED563039

q2 · i? · causal · r2

The authors' stated pattern from the posttest comparisons in the randomized study, reported in the Conclusions section. The article offers two possible explanations: the operation span measure was novel and strategies may have provided working memory practice, or embedded calculation in the training and the span measure accounted for the transfer.

"children without MD did not benefit from strategy conditions on posttest measures of solution and calculation accuracy, but benefited from strategy conditions on the posttest operation span measure."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.