No significant differences between Select and Generate conditions in the proportions of functional or dysfunctional behaviors, though the means aligned with the posttest results¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Mann–Whitney U-tests found no significant differences across conditions in the proportions of Functional or Dysfunctional behaviors, despite Select means aligning with better learning. → Rachel Lam 2019

Evidence¶

Rachel Lam 2019¶

Rachel Lam. (2019). What students do when encountering failure in collaborative tasks. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-019-0045-1

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Mann–Whitney U-tests comparing behavior proportions across the two conditions (10 dyads each); no significant difference, equivalence not tested. The authors note Select used more Functional and fewer Dysfunctional behaviors on average.

"There were no significant differences for Functional behaviors, z = −0.81, p = 0.46, or Dysfunctional behaviors, z = −0.81, p = 0.46. However, we note that the sample means aligned with the posttest results."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• A higher proportion of dysfunctional behaviors during micro-failures is significantly negatively correlated with posttest scores, while the proportion of functional behaviors shows a non-significant positive correlation — related