Claims

No significant correlation between simulator performance and self-reported mental workload (SURG-TLX)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Pearson correlations between performance and mental workload were not significant for the Tubes task (p = 0.37), Suture Sponge task (p = 0.79), or Dots and Needles task (p = 0.97). → Shafiei 2024

Evidence

Shafiei 2024

Shafiei, S. B., Shadpour, S., Sasangohar, F., Mohler, J. L., Attwood, K. & Jing, Z. (2024). Development of performance and learning rate evaluation models in robot-assisted surgery using electroencephalography and eye-tracking. npj Science of Learning 9:3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00216-y

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Pearson correlation analysis of performance scores against SURG-TLX mental-workload scores (six domains, each scored 1 to 20, summed) collected at the end of each attempt. Only p-values are printed; equivalence was not tested.

"The Pearson correlation between performance and mental workload was not significant for the Tubes task (Pearson correlation; p-value = 0.37), Suture Sponge task (Pearson correlation; p-value = 0.79), and Dots and Needles task (Pearson correlation; p-value = 0.97)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.