Claims

Among Malaysian Muslim science students, intensity of discord over scientific claims shows no direct link to scientific reasoning ability

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2008 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The Malaysian survey of 549 students did not reveal a direct link between intensity of discord and ability to reason scientifically. → Ian Robottom and Sharifah Norhaidah 2008

Evidence

Ian Robottom and Sharifah Norhaidah 2008

Ian Robottom and Sharifah Norhaidah. (2008). Western science and Islamic learners: When disciplines and culture intersect. Journal of Research in International Education 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1475240908091302

q2 · i? · associational · r2

A questionnaire-based survey of 549 Form 4 (age approximately 16) science students from government and religious schools in northern Malaysia, using Lawson's Classroom Test of Scientific Reasoning, Schommer's 63-item epistemological beliefs questionnaire, and a discord questionnaire. The study "did not reveal a direct link between intensity of discord and ability to reason scientifically."

"The study did not reveal a direct link between intensity of discord and ability to reason scientifically. The reasons for this are still unclear, indicating that more can be done to improve our insight in this area."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id no-direct-link-discord-scientific-reasoning-malaysian
title Among Malaysian Muslim science students, intensity of discord over scientific claims shows no direct link to scientific reasoning ability
description Among Malaysian Muslim science students, intensity of discord over scientific claims shows no direct link to scientific reasoning ability
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2008
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — ian-robottom-and-sharifah-norhaidah-2008

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.