Adequacy of regulation decisions did not depend on misconceptions or instructional method¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Neither the overall interaction nor individual interactions between misconceptions and instructional method were significant for regulation decision adequacy. → Anja Prinz-Weiß & Elisa Röhm 2025
Evidence¶
Anja Prinz-Weiß & Elisa Röhm 2025¶
Anja Prinz-Weiß & Elisa Röhm. (2025). To what extent can think sheets with or without reflection prompts support self-regulated learning from text? Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-025-09419-z
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Regression analysis on regulation decision adequacy (restudy decisions scored 0 to 1 against comprehension judgments) in the online experiment showed "no significant overall interaction"; individual interactions were not significant and main effects without interaction terms were not significant.
"The analysis on regulation decision adequacy showed no significant overall interaction between number of misconceptions before studying and instructional method, Δ R2 = .02, F(2, 86) = 0.80, p = .453."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Judgment accuracy of comprehension did not depend on misconceptions or instructional method
- Completing the think sheet more accurately was associated with higher comprehension, transfer, and regulation decision adequacy — related
- Think sheets counteracted the positive effect of misconceptions on transfer in the control group, though the overall interaction only approached significance — related
- Under reading-only, students with more misconceptions achieved better comprehension, but completing a think sheet removed this effect of misconceptions on comprehension — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
no-effect-regulation-decision-adequacy |
title |
Adequacy of regulation decisions did not depend on misconceptions or instructional method |
description |
Adequacy of regulation decisions did not depend on misconceptions or instructional method |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — anja-prinz-weiß-elisa-röhm-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.