No effects of reported planner or reviser scores were found on evaluating own text¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Neither planner nor reviser scores, nor their interactions with episode, significantly predicted evaluating own text. → Tillema 2011

Evidence¶

Tillema 2011¶

Tillema, M., van den Bergh, H., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Sanders, T. (2011). Relating self reports of writing behaviour and online task execution using a temporal model. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-011-9072-x

q2 · i? · associational · r1

In the multilevel regression analyses of the 20 students' think-aloud protocols, evaluating own text showed no significant main or interaction effects of offline scores. The article offers no effect size for this null finding; equivalence was not tested.

"No effects, in any form, were found on the activity 'evaluating own text'. This activity is therefore not featured in Fig. 4."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Reported planner scores interact with episode: high planners plan more at the start and less at the end of task execution — related
• The occurrence of six (meta)cognitive writing activities varies significantly across episodes of task execution — related
• Planner and reviser questionnaire scores show frequency main effects on several online activities, with no interaction with episode — related