No eligible studies of collegiate recovery communities were identified, so there is no rigorous evidence on CRC effectiveness¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Despite a comprehensive search, the review identified no eligible studies examining CRC effects on academic achievement, college completion, or substance use outcomes. → Hennessy E. A. 2018
Evidence¶
Hennessy E. A. 2018¶
Hennessy E. A., Tanner‐Smith E. E., Finch A. J., Sathe N. A., Kugley S. A. (2018). Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2018.9
q2 · i? · review · r3
The review's Results section reports the outcome of its systematic search across electronic databases, research registers, grey literature, reference lists, and expert contacts: only one RHS quasi‐experimental study qualified, and no CRC studies met the eligibility criteria for the review's primary analysis.
"Only one study met criteria for inclusion in the review. This study used a QED to examine the effects of RHSs on high school students' academic and substance use outcomes. No eligible studies examining CRCs were identified in the search."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Comprehensive searches identified only seven eligible studies, and quantitative synthesis was blocked by critical risk of bias and unreportable effect sizes — related
- No rigorous evaluations of trauma-informed approaches in schools met inclusion criteria in a comprehensive systematic review search — a broader claim this one bears on
- Recovery high school attendance may improve absenteeism, abstinence, and reduce marijuana and other drug use, based on a single quasi‐experimental study with serious risk of bias — related
- The review planned meta‐analytic synthesis but could not use it because only one study met the inclusion criteria — related
- There is not yet much rigorous evidence to guide decision making around instructional and support strategies for adult learners — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
no-eligible-crc-studies-identified |
title |
No eligible studies of collegiate recovery communities were identified, so there is no rigorous evidence on CRC effectiveness |
description |
No eligible studies of collegiate recovery communities were identified, so there is no rigorous evidence on CRC effectiveness |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2018 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — hennessy-e-a-2018 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.