Claims

No significant difference between inquiry-based and subject matter groups on the first unit posttest

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Following the first two-week instructional period, the difference in posttest scores between the inquiry-based and subject matter groups was not statistically significant. → Thoron 2011

Evidence

Thoron 2011

Thoron, A. C., & Myers, B. E. (2011). Effects of Inquiry–based Agriscience Instruction on Student Achievement. Journal of Agricultural Education, 52(4). https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2011.04175

q2 · i? · causal · r2

ANCOVA of the first instructional period's posttest with pretest covariate: inquiry-based mean 63.49 (SD = 17.86) versus subject matter mean 60.43 (SD = 17.44); the article reports the contrast as "not be statistically significant, F(4,334) = 2.82, p = .09, r2 = .09". Equivalence was not tested.

"Table 6 illustrates posttest scores were found to not be statistically significant, F(4,334) = 2.82, p = .09, r2 = .09."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.