Claims

No significant gender difference in particle-concept gains from the courseware (male N-gain 0.45 vs female 0.65, p = 0.265)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The increase in particle-concept understanding did not differ significantly between male and female students (Mann Whitney significance 0.265), despite differing N-gain magnitudes. → Sopandi 2018

Evidence

Sopandi 2018

Sopandi, W., Kadarohman, A., Rosbiono, M., Latip, A., & Sukardi, R. R. (2018). The Courseware of Discontinuous Nature of Matter in Teaching the States of Matter and Their Changes. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 61-76. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1115a

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Mann Whitney test on pretest-posttest N-gain scores of 31 male and 34 female students in the particle-concept sample. The article reports "no significant difference on the increase of the understanding of the particle concept between male and female groups"; no effect size is printed.

"The N-gain average score difference between male and female groups gave significance score of 0.265. This score shows that there is no significant difference on the increase of the understanding of the particle concept between male and female groups."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.