Claims

The mental integration task showed no general advantage of the dynamic over the static visual design in overall accuracy

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · checked against its sources 2026-10-21 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Mean accuracy was nearly identical for dynamic (0.76) and static (0.76 vs 0.75) visual designs, with no general advantage of the dynamic design. → Tim Kühl 2022

Evidence

Tim Kühl 2022

Tim Kühl, Benedict C. O. F. Fehringer, Stefan Münzer. (2022). Unifying the Ability-as-Compensator and Ability-as-Enhancer Hypotheses. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09650-5

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Descriptive results of the N = 77 experiment (Table 1). The MLM's visual design main effect was not significant, b = .04, t(73) = 1.81, p = .075; only the quadratic interaction terms reached significance.

"Apparently, there was no general advantage of the dynamic visual design (mean accuracy = 0.76) for the accuracy in the mental integration task, compared with the static visual design (mean accuracy = 0.75)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id no-general-dynamic-advantage-mental-integration
title The mental integration task showed no general advantage of the dynamic over the static visual design in overall accuracy
description The mental integration task showed no general advantage of the dynamic over the static visual design in overall accuracy
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
source_checked 2026-10-21
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — tim-kühl-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.