Claims

High stakes should never be attached to observational measures used in formative evaluation of early childhood programs.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2007 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Observational measures are appropriate for formative evaluation but should not carry high stakes. → Sally Atkins-Burnett 2007

Evidence

Sally Atkins-Burnett 2007

Sally Atkins-Burnett. (2007). Measuring Children's Progress from Preschool Through Third Grade. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/measuring-childrens-progress-from-preschool-through-third-grade

q1 · i? · review · r2

The abstract states the author discusses observational measures "in formative evaluation efforts" with the explicit caution that "high stakes should never be attached to these measures."

"The use of these measures in formative evaluation efforts is discussed with the caution that high stakes should never be attached to these measures."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id no-high-stakes-on-observational-measures
title High stakes should never be attached to observational measures used in formative evaluation of early childhood programs.
description High stakes should never be attached to observational measures used in formative evaluation of early childhood programs.
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2007
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — sally-atkins-burnett-2007

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.