No interaction between education or age and narrative codality on comprehension¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr3·q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The education × codality interaction was not significant, and Bayesian analysis strongly favored the main-effects model. → Markus Huff 2025
q3 i? The age × codality interaction was not significant, with extreme Bayesian evidence for its absence. → Markus Huff 2025 (2)
Evidence¶
Markus Huff 2025¶
Markus Huff, Natalia Gagarina, Ekaterina Varkentin, Irina R. Brich. (2025). Education, Not Age, Linked to Narrative Comprehension. https://aspredicted.org/WT9_TK6
q3 · i? · causal · r3
In the main experiment the education × codality interaction was not significant (χ2(2) = 3.12, p = .210); Bayesian runs of 20 unseeded computations gave a mean BF of 1.97 x 105 favoring the main-effect model, described as extreme evidence for no interaction. No effect size was printed.
"But as expected, the interaction of both factors was not significant, χ2(2) = 3.12, p = .210, thus providing tentative partial evidence for H3."
Markus Huff 2025 (2)¶
Markus Huff, Natalia Gagarina, Ekaterina Varkentin, Irina R. Brich. (2025). Education, Not Age, Linked to Narrative Comprehension. https://aspredicted.org/WT9_TK6
q3 · i? · causal · r3
The age × codality interaction was likewise not significant (χ2(1) = 0.69, p = .405); Bayesian comparison of the main-effects model against the full model yielded a mean BF of 2.18 x 1010, extreme evidence for the absence of the interaction. No effect size was printed.
"Finally, the interaction of age and codality was not significant, χ2(1) = 0.69, p = .405, thus, providing further partial evidence for Hypothesis 3."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Narrative comprehension increases from low to high education, independent of narrative codality — related
- Narrative comprehension of bridging inferences remains stable across the adult age span — related
- Pictorial narratives are comprehended better than textual narratives across all education and age groups — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
no-interaction-of-education-or-age-with-codality |
title |
No interaction between education or age and narrative codality on comprehension |
description |
No interaction between education or age and narrative codality on comprehension |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — markus-huff-2025, markus-huff-2025-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.