Claims

Parent spatial language at 24 months does not predict child spatial language two years later

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Longitudinal regression models showed parent spatial language at 24 months did not significantly add to prediction of child spatial language at 48 months. → Farran 2025

Evidence

Farran 2025

Farran, E. K., Fink, E., Hughes, C., Gilligan-Lee, K. A., & The NewFAMS team. (2025). Limited sex differences in spatial language in parent-child dyads. Learning and Instruction, 95, 102006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102006

q3 · i? · associational · r3

Longitudinal multiple regressions (N = 111) predicted 48-month child spatial language from 24-month parent spatial language plus controls. Step 2 did not significantly improve fit: quantity F-change < 1; quality "F-change (4, 100) = 1.35, p = .255, ΔR2 change = .014".

"Model 2 did not significantly add to the model (quantity: F-change <1; quality: F-change (4, 100) = 1.35, p = .255, ΔR2 change = .014)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id no-longitudinal-parent-child-spatial-language-prediction
title Parent spatial language at 24 months does not predict child spatial language two years later
description Parent spatial language at 24 months does not predict child spatial language two years later
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — farran-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.