RT propensity shows no reliable main effect on learning rate, while prior proficiency is positively associated with learning rate¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · no dated study recorded · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Across the full practice period, RT propensity has no reliable main effect on learning rate (β = −0.02, p = .534), whereas prior proficiency positively predicts learning rate (β = 0.10, p = .009). → main-effect-1
Evidence¶
main-effect-1¶
Conrad Borchers, Lijin Zhang, Kexin Yang, Tomohiro Nagashima, and Benjamin W. Domingue. 2026. Understanding Student Effort Using Response-Time Propensities During Problem Solving. Proceedings of the Thirteenth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (L@S '26). https://doi.org/10.1145/3774398.3811624
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Regression analysis predicting student learning-rate slopes from the iAFM using RT propensity and prior proficiency, on student-level parameters from the eight tutoring deployments. The article reports no reliable RT main effect and a positive proficiency effect; equivalence was not tested.
"RT propensity shows no reliable main effect on learning rate (𝛽=− 0.02, 95% CI[−0.09, 0.05], 𝑝=. 534), whereas prior proficiency is positively associated with learning rate ( 𝛽= 0.10, 95% CI[0.02, 0.17], 𝑝=. 009)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Higher prior proficiency is associated with faster step-level response-time propensities — related
- The RT propensity–learning relationship is strongest early in the class session and attenuates later — related
- The association between RT propensity and learning rate is moderated by prior proficiency: slower propensities predict greater learning efficiency for higher-proficiency students but are weakly negative for lower-proficiency students — related
- Response-time propensities show moderate to strong within-student stability across practice session slices — related
- Prior Knowledge Determines New Learning — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
no-main-effect-rt-propensity-learning-rate |
title |
RT propensity shows no reliable main effect on learning rate, while prior proficiency is positively associated with learning rate |
description |
RT propensity shows no reliable main effect on learning rate, while prior proficiency is positively associated with learning rate |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — main-effect-1 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.