Claims

No statistically significant mentoring–retention relationships emerged in districts with any characteristics examined, and subgroup differences exceeding 10 percentage points showed no clear pattern

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Regressions estimated separately by district subgroups found no statistically significant mentoring–retention relationships; nine descriptive differences exceeded 10 percentage points but none was statistically significant in the small subgroup samples. → Brodersen 2025

Evidence

Brodersen 2025

Brodersen, R. M., Chiang, H., Coleman, K., Hitt, C., Li, J., Ritter, G., & Weston-Sementelli, J. (2025). Examining the mentoring experiences of first-year teachers in Missouri (REL 2025–014). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/use-work/resource-library/report/descriptive-study/examining-mentoring-experiences-first-year-teachers-missouri

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Subgroup regression and descriptive analyses across district poverty, achievement, and rurality subgroups (tables C15–C17). Supplemental within-school and within-state analyses similarly yielded "no consistent statistically significant findings."

"However, no clear pattern emerged in the results, and none of these differences was statistically significant for the small sample sizes of the subgroup analyses."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id no-mentoring-retention-relationships-by-district-subgroups
title No statistically significant mentoring–retention relationships emerged in districts with any characteristics examined, and subgroup differences exceeding 10 percentage points showed no clear pattern
description No statistically significant mentoring–retention relationships emerged in districts with any characteristics examined, and subgroup differences exceeding 10 percentage points showed no clear pattern
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — brodersen-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.