The association between antibullying attitudes and intervention likelihood does not differ by form of bullying¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Multilevel meta-regressions found the attitudes–intervention likelihood association did not differ between physical bullying and verbal, relational, or cyberbullying forms, nor between covert/indirect and overt/direct forms. → Dawes 2024

Evidence¶

Dawes 2024¶

Dawes, M., Malamut, S. T., Guess, H., & Lohrbach, E. (2024). Teachers' Attitudes Toward Bullying and Intervention Responses: A Systematic and Meta-analytic Review. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09951-5

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Two multilevel meta-regression moderation analyses tested the a priori moderator form of bullying among hypothetical-report effect sizes, comparing verbal, relational, and cyberbullying to physical (reference), and covert/indirect to overt/direct. No moderation was found (all ps > 0.08).

"the strength of the association between attitudes and intervention likelihood did not differ between physical bullying and verbal (p = 0.081), relational (p = 0.645), or cyberbullying (p = 0.765). Lastly, the strength of the association between antibully ing attitudes and intervention likelihood did not differ between covert/indirect forms and overt/direct forms, p = 0.436"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Teachers' antibullying attitudes are positively associated with intervention likelihood in hypothetical bullying scenarios (r = 0.48) — related
• Teachers' perceived severity of bullying predicts their likelihood of reacting to incidents of aggression — related