Claims

The authors declined requests to name specific technologies or focus the standards on AI, citing rapid technological change

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Requests to list specific technologies or focus the standards on artificial intelligence were declined because the standards are for any digital technology and naming technologies can quickly leave documents dated. → Helen Crompton 2026

Evidence

Helen Crompton 2026

Helen Crompton, Diane Burke and Christine Nickel. (2026). Designing faculty standards for technology integration in higher education institutions: a design-based research study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-026-00584-y

q2 · i? · design · r3

Macro cycle two retrospective analysis of coded feedback. Faculty and accrediting associations requested named technology lists and an AI focus; the authors responded that the standards are overarching and do not focus on specific technologies, citing prior evidence on technological change.

"Extant empirical evidence across time (viz., Baron, 2010) show that the technological context is highly changing and naming technologies can quickly leave documents dated and irrelevant as technologies are replaced, renamed, or obsolete."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id no-named-technologies-standards-scope
title The authors declined requests to name specific technologies or focus the standards on AI, citing rapid technological change
description The authors declined requests to name specific technologies or focus the standards on AI, citing rapid technological change
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — helen-crompton-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.