Claims

No individual support activity other than feedback on lesson plans significantly moderated the intervention effect

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Feedback on lessons, modeling, and guided reflection showed no significant moderator effects on teacher self-efficacy. → Mok 2022

Evidence

Mok 2022

Mok, S. Y., Rupp, D., & Holzberger, D. (2022). What kind of individual support activities in interventions foster pre-service and beginning teachers' self-efficacy? A meta-analysis. Preprint submitted for peer-review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100552

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r?

Meta-regression moderator analyses across the 28-study sample found no significant effects for feedback on lessons, modeling of teaching or planning practices, or guided reflection. The article reports no effect sizes for these null moderators, so impact is unquantified.

"No further moderator effects were significant in our meta-analysis."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id no-other-support-activity-moderators-significant
title No individual support activity other than feedback on lesson plans significantly moderated the intervention effect
description No individual support activity other than feedback on lesson plans significantly moderated the intervention effect
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — mok-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.