Claims

Heuristic and algorithmic training conditions do not differ in posttest problem-solving performance

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Posttest problem-solving performance did not differ between the heuristic and algorithmic training conditions. → Raaijmakers 2018

Evidence

Raaijmakers 2018

Raaijmakers, S. F., Baars, M., Schaap, L., Paas, F., van Merriënboer, J., & van Gog, T. (2018). Training self-regulated learning skills with video modeling examples: Do task-selection skills transfer? Instructional Science, 46, 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9434-0

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Median test comparing heuristic (M = 2.70, SD = 1.05) and algorithmic (M = 2.69, SD = 1.30) conditions on the posttest found no significant difference (r = .09); equivalence was not tested.

"However, problem-solving performance did not differ between training conditions, v2(1) = 0.658, p = .417, r = .09."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id no-posttest-difference-between-training-conditions
title Heuristic and algorithmic training conditions do not differ in posttest problem-solving performance
description Heuristic and algorithmic training conditions do not differ in posttest problem-solving performance
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2018
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — raaijmakers-2018

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.