Claims

Participants in the four visualization conditions did not differ significantly in prior knowledge about Pergamon

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i1 A one-factorial ANOVA on self-rated prior knowledge about Pergamon revealed no significant differences between the four conditions. → Glaser 2022

Evidence

Glaser 2022

Glaser, M., Lengyel, D., Toulouse, C., & Schwan, S. (2022). How Do We Deal with Uncertain Information? Effects of Verbal and Visual Expressions of Uncertainty on Learning. Educational Psychology Review (2022) 34:1097–1131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09659-4

q3 · i1 · causal · r2

Prior-knowledge check ANOVA in the Results section compared the four conditions on one self-rated item; it "revealed no significant differences between the conditions" with F (3, 123) = 0.79, p = 0.504, ηp2 = 0.019. Equivalence was not tested.

"revealed no significant differences between the conditions, F (3, 123) = 0.79, p = 0.504, ηp2 = 0.019."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id no-prior-knowledge-differences-between-conditions
title Participants in the four visualization conditions did not differ significantly in prior knowledge about Pergamon
description Participants in the four visualization conditions did not differ significantly in prior knowledge about Pergamon
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — glaser-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.