Claims

Sequential mediation through both intellectual helplessness and working memory is not significant

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Sequential mediation through both helplessness and working memory was not significant. → Bedyńska S 2018

Evidence

Bedyńska S 2018

Bedyńska S, Krejtz I and Sedek G (2018) Chronic Stereotype Threat Is Associated With Mathematical Achievement on Representative Sample of Secondary Schoolgirls: The Role of Gender Identification, Working Memory, and Intellectual Helplessness. Front. Psychol. 9:428. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00428

q3 · i? · associational · r2

The moderated multiple serial mediation model tested a sequential path through both mediators. The article reports "Sequential mediation through both helplessness and working memory was not significant" with the confidence interval including zero.

"Sequential mediation through both helplessness and working memory was not significant ([β =−0.009, SE = 0.005, p = 0.07, CI (−0.020, 0.001)]"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id no-sequential-mediation-helplessness-working-memory
title Sequential mediation through both intellectual helplessness and working memory is not significant
description Sequential mediation through both intellectual helplessness and working memory is not significant
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2018
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — bedyńska-s-2018

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.