No statistically significant interaction effects between satisfaction and adaptive feedback on the subsequent pre-actional phase; only marginal trends emerged (H4 not supported)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? No statistically significant satisfaction × feedback interaction effects were observed on the subsequent pre-actional phase. → Mathias Mejeh 2026
q3 i? Marginally significant trends (p < .10) included a positive satisfaction × informative feedback interaction on planning and negative interactions of directive feedback on hope and transformative feedback on task value. → Mathias Mejeh 2026
Evidence¶
Mathias Mejeh 2026¶
Mathias Mejeh, Yvonne M. Fromm (2026). Fostering self-regulated learning through adaptive learning technology: A differentiated perspective on the role of feedback. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2026.102394
q3 · i? · associational · r1
Interaction tests in the HLM models for the post-actional to pre-actional transition (H4) among 194 students. All feedback moderation effects were non-significant or only marginally significant (p < .10), including a positive satisfaction × informative interaction on planning and a negative satisfaction × directive interaction on hope.
"Not supporting our fourth hypothesis (H4), no statistically significant interaction effects were observed between satisfaction and adaptive feedback on the subsequent pre-actional phase. However, several marginally significant trends (p < .10) were identified."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Different forms of feedback within a single ALT play distinct, phase-specific roles in SRL, with directive feedback appearing helpful before but not after task engagement — related
- Time Management showed a marginally significant post-intervention difference favouring GenAI feedback, while Goal Setting, Help Seeking and Self-Evaluation showed no significant differences — related
- Transformative feedback attenuated the positive association between joy and regulatory behavior, and adaptive feedback moderation was otherwise limited, not supporting H2 — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
no-significant-satisfaction-feedback-interactions |
title |
No statistically significant interaction effects between satisfaction and adaptive feedback on the subsequent pre-actional phase; only marginal trends emerged (H4 not supported) |
description |
No statistically significant interaction effects between satisfaction and adaptive feedback on the subsequent pre-actional phase; only marginal trends emerged (H4 not supported) |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-12 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — mathias-mejeh-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.