Claims

No statistically significant summer gap in children's reading time by parental education in the APSCC

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The estimated ten-minute summer reading gap between children of college-educated parents and parents who did not complete high school is not statistically significant. → Gershenson 2013

Evidence

Gershenson 2013

Gershenson, S. (2013). Do summer time-use gaps vary by socioeconomic status? American University. http://www.bls.gov/tus/

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Tobit interaction estimates from APSCC book-reading time. The article reports the estimate as imprecise, possibly due to the small APSCC sample; no effect size is printed, so equivalence was not tested.

"column 5 shows a ten minute summer gap in reading between children of college-educated parents and parents who failed to complete high school, though again this difference is not statistically significant"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id no-significant-summer-reading-gap-apscc
title No statistically significant summer gap in children's reading time by parental education in the APSCC
description No statistically significant summer gap in children's reading time by parental education in the APSCC
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2013
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — gershenson-2013

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.