The intervention produced no statistically significant effects on standardized measures of reading comprehension¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? No statistically significant differences were found between treatment and comparison groups on standardized reading comprehension measures. → Amy E. Barth 2016
Evidence¶
Amy E. Barth 2016¶
Amy E. Barth, Sharon Vaughn, Philip Capin, Eunsoo Cho, Stephanie Stillman-Spisak, Leticia Martinez, and Heather Kincaid. (2016). Effects of a Text-processing Comprehension Intervention on Struggling Middle School Readers. Top Lang Disord. 2016; 36(4): 368–389. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000101
q3 · i? · causal · r2
ANCOVA results on standardized reading comprehension measures (Gates-MacGinitie, WJ-III Passage Comprehension, Bridge-IT) with pretest covariates in the randomized trial. The article reports no statistically significant differences; equivalence was not tested.
"We did not find any statistically significant differences on standardized reading comprehension measures."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- A standard Tier 2 multi-component reading intervention produced no statistically significant differences versus business-as-usual on any of seven reading outcomes for fourth graders at or below the 15th percentile in comprehension — related
- A 13-week multicomponent small-group reading intervention did not produce significantly better word reading, comprehension, or fluency outcomes than typical remedial instruction for middle school students with severe reading difficulties — related
- The multi-component intervention produced statistically significant advantages over business-as-usual on one decoding measure (ES = 0.58) and one fluency measure (ES = 0.46), but not on reading comprehension — related
- After one school year of implementation (first cohort), the curricula produced no statistically significant positive impacts, and four statistically significant negative impacts were observed. — related
- A large randomized trial found no statistically significant effects of Project CRISS® on standardized grade 5 comprehension measures (James-Burdumy et al., 2009) — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.