Non-interactive teaching was not generally more effective than restudy, but was more effective in humanities, upper secondary education, and when graded¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · theoreticalr2–r3·q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Across 20 teaching units (N = 191 students, within-participants design), non-interactive teaching was not generally more effective than restudy. → Lachner 2024
q2 i? Moderation analyses revealed non-interactive teaching was more effective in the humanities, in upper secondary education, and when it was graded as an external incentive. → Lachner 2024 (2)
Evidence¶
Lachner 2024¶
Lachner, A., Sibley, L., & Wagner, S. (2024). Practice Recommendations or Not? The LoGeT Model as Empirical Approach to Generate Localized, Generalized, and Transferable Evidence. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09876-z
q2 · i? · theoretical · r2
In the article's third example (Sibley, Russ et al., 2023b), ten design teams of in-service teachers and master's students developed 20 teaching units; students (N = 191) received different sequences of non-interactive teaching and restudy across two comparably difficult lessons in a within-participants design with five open-ended questions per unit.
"Overall, it could be demonstrated that non-interactive teaching was not generally more effective than restudy"
Lachner 2024 (2)¶
Lachner, A., Sibley, L., & Wagner, S. (2024). Practice Recommendations or Not? The LoGeT Model as Empirical Approach to Generate Localized, Generalized, and Transferable Evidence. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09876-z
q2 · i? · theoretical · r3
Moderation analyses in the same within-participants schooling study (N = 191) identified boundary conditions: the advantage of non-interactive teaching over restudy emerged "in the humanities as well as upper secondary education and when it was graded, as external incentive."
"However, additional moderation analyses revealed that non-interactive teaching was more effective in the humanities as well as upper secondary education and when it was graded, as external incentive."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students' domain-specific self-concept moderates non-interactive teaching: low self-concept students profit, high self-concept students do not — related
- High levels of induced social presence during non-interactive teaching can impair learning relative to restudy (a double-edged sword) — related
- Prior knowledge moderates non-interactive teaching: low conceptual knowledge learners profit more, but very low-knowledge learners may not benefit at all — related
- Non-interactive teaching yields higher immediate scientific knowledge than restudy in secondary physics classrooms — reports the opposite
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
non-interactive-teaching-not-generally-more-effective-moderated |
title |
Non-interactive teaching was not generally more effective than restudy, but was more effective in humanities, upper secondary education, and when graded |
description |
Non-interactive teaching was not generally more effective than restudy, but was more effective in humanities, upper secondary education, and when graded |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — lachner-2024, lachner-2024-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.