Claims

Non-interactive teaching was not generally more effective than restudy, but was more effective in humanities, upper secondary education, and when graded

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · theoretical r2–r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Across 20 teaching units (N = 191 students, within-participants design), non-interactive teaching was not generally more effective than restudy. → Lachner 2024 q2 i? Moderation analyses revealed non-interactive teaching was more effective in the humanities, in upper secondary education, and when it was graded as an external incentive. → Lachner 2024 (2)

Evidence

Lachner 2024

Lachner, A., Sibley, L., & Wagner, S. (2024). Practice Recommendations or Not? The LoGeT Model as Empirical Approach to Generate Localized, Generalized, and Transferable Evidence. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09876-z

q2 · i? · theoretical · r2

In the article's third example (Sibley, Russ et al., 2023b), ten design teams of in-service teachers and master's students developed 20 teaching units; students (N = 191) received different sequences of non-interactive teaching and restudy across two comparably difficult lessons in a within-participants design with five open-ended questions per unit.

"Overall, it could be demonstrated that non-interactive teaching was not generally more effective than restudy"

Lachner 2024 (2)

Lachner, A., Sibley, L., & Wagner, S. (2024). Practice Recommendations or Not? The LoGeT Model as Empirical Approach to Generate Localized, Generalized, and Transferable Evidence. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09876-z

q2 · i? · theoretical · r3

Moderation analyses in the same within-participants schooling study (N = 191) identified boundary conditions: the advantage of non-interactive teaching over restudy emerged "in the humanities as well as upper secondary education and when it was graded, as external incentive."

"However, additional moderation analyses revealed that non-interactive teaching was more effective in the humanities as well as upper secondary education and when it was graded, as external incentive."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id non-interactive-teaching-not-generally-more-effective-moderated
title Non-interactive teaching was not generally more effective than restudy, but was more effective in humanities, upper secondary education, and when graded
description Non-interactive teaching was not generally more effective than restudy, but was more effective in humanities, upper secondary education, and when graded
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — lachner-2024, lachner-2024-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.