Claims

Assessments not designed for MLLs fail to differentiate ELA skills for students with very low ACCESS scores but align strongly at moderate-to-high ACCESS scores

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Assessments not designed for MLLs do not differentiate ELA skills for students with very low ACCESS scores, but are strongly aligned with ACCESS among moderate-to-high scorers. → Allensworth 2026

Evidence

Allensworth 2026

Allensworth, E., Gordon, A. & Young, C. (2026). Combining early grade assessments to study literacy skills: Addressing the variability in tests taken across schools and students. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 19(1), 1-26. https://consortium.uchicago.edu/publications/combining-early-grade-assessments-to-study-literacy-skills doi:10.1080/19345747.2026.2636957

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Correlational analysis by ACCESS score level in Chicago K-2 data. For students scoring above 270 on ACCESS, the relationship with other assessments was very strong, allowing good cross-test prediction.

"The assessments not designed for MLLs do not differentiate ELA skills for students with very low ACCESS scores (i.e., low English proficiency), but the same tests are strongly aligned with ACCESS scores among students with moderate-to-high ACCESS scores."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id non-mll-assessments-low-access-differentiation
title Assessments not designed for MLLs fail to differentiate ELA skills for students with very low ACCESS scores but align strongly at moderate-to-high ACCESS scores
description Assessments not designed for MLLs fail to differentiate ELA skills for students with very low ACCESS scores but align strongly at moderate-to-high ACCESS scores
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
recheck_by 2029
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — allensworth-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.