Claims

Students performed not as well and experienced higher levels of anxiety if the language of the virtual simulation was not in their native language

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students performed not as well and experienced higher levels of anxiety if the language of the virtual simulation was not in their native language. → Langan 2025

Evidence

Langan 2025

Langan, L., Frazer, K., Darley, A., Goodman, L., Browne, F., Fulfilled, P., Halligan, P., & Redmond, C. (2025). Inclusive pedagogy in online simulation‐based learning in undergraduate nursing education: A scoping review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 81, 591–606. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16284

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports that "students performed not as well and experienced higher levels of anxiety if the language of the virtual simulation was not in their native language".

"Kim, Kang, and De Gagne (2021)) found that students performed not as well and experienced higher levels of anxiety if the language of the virtual simulation was not in their native language."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.