Claims

Nine of 30 studies reported a propensity towards lower mean empathy scores in non-Western compared to Western countries, all applying the JSPE-S

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Nine cross-sectional studies, from India, Kuwait, China, Korea, Iran and Pakistan, reported lower mean empathy scores compared to Western countries. → Andersen Freja Allerelli 2020 q2 i? All nine studies applied the JSPE-S, and the review cites cultural differences in responding to the instrument as a possible explanation. → Andersen Freja Allerelli 2020

Evidence

Andersen Freja Allerelli 2020

Andersen Freja Allerelli, Johansen Ann-Sofie Bering, Søndergaard Jens, Andersen Christina Maar, Assing Hvidt Elisabeth. (2020). Revisiting the trajectory of medical students' empathy, and impact of gender, specialty preferences and nationality: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1964-5

q3 · i? · review · r3

Synthesis of the review's 30 studies conducted in 20 different countries. The review reports "Nine studies in our systematic review reported a propensity towards lower empathy scores in non-Western compared to Western countries", all applying the JSPE-S.

"Nine studies in our systematic review reported a propensity towards lower empathy scores in non-Western compared to Western countries. All of these studies applied the JSPE-S."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.