Children are more accurate and faster on NonStroop than Stroop trials of the Pet Store Stroop task¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2022: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Children were more accurate on NonStroop compared to Stroop trials, t(107) = 5.021, p < .001. → Quiñones-Camacho Laura E. 2019
q3 i? Children were faster on the NonStroop (M = 2740.30 ms) compared to the Stroop (M = 2985.35 ms) condition, t(106) = 6.283, p < .001. → Quiñones-Camacho Laura E. 2019 (2)
Evidence¶
Quiñones-Camacho Laura E. 2019¶
Quiñones-Camacho Laura E., Fishburn Frank A., Camacho M. Catalina, Wakschlag Lauren S., Perlman Susan B. (2019). Cognitive flexibility-related prefrontal activation in preschoolers: A biological approach to temperamental effortful control. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6969345/
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Behavioral analysis of the Pet Store Stroop task found "Children were more accurate on 'NonStroop' compared to 'Stroop' trials, t(107) = 5.021, p < .001" (M = 76.49% vs. 66.26%).
"Accuracy was good for both 'NonStroop' (M = 76.49%; SD = 18.57%;) and 'Stroop' conditions (M = 66.26%; SD = 25.80%). Children were more accurate on 'NonStroop' compared to 'Stroop' trials, t(107) = 5.021, p < .001."
Quiñones-Camacho Laura E. 2019 (2)¶
Quiñones-Camacho Laura E., Fishburn Frank A., Camacho M. Catalina, Wakschlag Lauren S., Perlman Susan B. (2019). Cognitive flexibility-related prefrontal activation in preschoolers: A biological approach to temperamental effortful control. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6969345/
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Reaction time analysis found "Children were faster on the 'NonStroop' (M = 2740.30 ms; SD = 495.94 ms) compared to the 'Stroop' (M = 2985.35 ms; SD = 495.11 ms) condition" (t(106) = 6.283, p < .001).
"Reaction time also varied based on condition (t(106) = 6.283, p < .001). Children were faster on the 'NonStroop' (M = 2740.30 ms; SD = 495.94 ms) compared to the 'Stroop' (M = 2985.35 ms; SD = 495.11 ms) condition."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Low working memory span individuals are more affected by Stroop task lapses and report more task-related mind-wandering — related
- Greater parent-reported temperamental effortful control predicts less DLPFC activation during cognitive flexibility in preschoolers — related
- The Stroop condition elicits significantly more left DLPFC activation than the NonStroop condition in preschoolers — related
- Congruency effects on both numerical and non-numerical inhibition tasks occur in all three age groups, with an age-by-congruency interaction only on the numerical task — a broader claim this one bears on
- Match trials are more accurate and faster than mismatch trials in the dual-modality task, with no language group difference — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
nonstroop-more-accurate-faster-than-stroop |
title |
Children are more accurate and faster on NonStroop than Stroop trials of the Pet Store Stroop task |
description |
Children are more accurate and faster on NonStroop than Stroop trials of the Pet Store Stroop task |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
recheck_by |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — quiñones-camacho-laura-e-2019, quiñones-camacho-laura-e-2019-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.