Claims

Adding social-norm comparison information (Norms) produced no additional reduction in absences beyond Encourage + Self

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? There was no additional reduction in absences caused by the Norms component (p=0.24); Encourage + Self and Encourage + Self + Norms mailings had statistically indistinguishable impacts on attendance. → Rogers and Feller 2016

Evidence

Rogers and Feller 2016

Todd Rogers, Avi Feller. (2016). Parent Beliefs and Student Absences: Large Absence-Reduction Field Experiment. SREE Spring 2016 Conference Abstract. https://www.sree.org/conferences/2016/

q3 · i? · causal · r2

In the randomized field experiment, the Encourage + Self + Norms arm (7,666 students) received mail comparing the student's absences to the typical student in their school and grade. No significant additional effect versus Encourage + Self; equivalence was not tested.

"However, there was no additional reduction in absences caused by the Norms component (p=0.24), meaning that the Encourage + Self and the Encourage + Self + Norms mailings had statistically indistinguishable impacts on attendance."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.