Claims

Nudges significantly decreased the share of schools with sub-proficient average test scores, from 17.1% to 8.4%

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The share of schools below the State minimum proficiency level fell significantly from 17.1% to 8.4% in treated schools (90% CI: [-0.166, -0.008]). → Lichand 2024

Evidence

Lichand 2024

Lichand, G., Christen, J., & Van Egeraat, E. (2024). Neglecting students’ socio-emotional skills magnified learning losses during the pandemic. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00235-9

q3 · i? · causal · r3

School-level analysis of the 2021 State-wide exam (sub-proficient = average score below 250). In control schools the share of sub-proficient schools rebounded to 22% in math and 10% in Portuguese by 2021, while in treated schools it reached less than 15% in math and 0% in Portuguese.

"Nudges significantly decreased the share of schools with sub-pro ficient average test scores, from 17.1% to 8.4% (90% CI: [ −0.166, −0.008]; column 7)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id nudges-decrease-share-sub-proficient-schools
title Nudges significantly decreased the share of schools with sub-proficient average test scores, from 17.1% to 8.4%
description Nudges significantly decreased the share of schools with sub-proficient average test scores, from 17.1% to 8.4%
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — lichand-2024

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.