Claims

Nurses' knowledge of pressure injury prevention is frequently inadequate, particularly in prevention-specific domains.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2031: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Across regions, nurses' knowledge of pressure injury prevention was frequently reported as low or suboptimal, with deficits most pronounced in prevention-specific domains such as repositioning and pressure/shear reduction. → Saleh Zyad T. 2026

Evidence

Saleh Zyad T. 2026

Saleh Zyad T., Rababa Majdi, Al‐Za'areer Majed S., Elshatarat Rami A., Shahin Mahmoud Abdel Hameed, Hamithi Manal Ali, Abdelkader Raghad, Alnawafleh Khaldoon Aied, Alharbi Amal Ali, Alasmari Amal Ali, Al‐Sayaghi Anas Khaled, Al‐Sayaghi Khaled M. (2026). Nurses' Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Pressure Injury Prevention: A Systematic Review. International Wound Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.70855

q3 · i? · review · r2

Narrative synthesis of 29 cross-sectional studies found knowledge frequently suboptimal, with scores ranging from "11.1–11.8 out of 25–26" to over 80% in a minority of studies.

"Across all regions, nurses' knowledge of PU/PI prevention was frequently reported as low or suboptimal. Knowledge scores ranged from very low raw scores (e.g., 11.1–11.8 out of 25–26) to higher percentage‐based scores exceeding 80% in a limited number of studies"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.