Claims

Nursing-only TBL subgroups show a larger GRAT–IRAT difference (SMD = 2.368) than other health-professions subgroups, though the subgroup test is not significant

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesis r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 The nursing-only subgroup showed a higher SMD of 2.368 (95% CI 2.05–2.6, I2 = 48%) versus SMD = 1.92 for the others subgroup. → Ngoc Phan Nguyen 2020 q3 i? The test of subgroup differences was not statistically significant (p = 0.1), possibly due to fewer studies in the nursing-only subgroup. → Ngoc Phan Nguyen 2020 (2)

Evidence

Ngoc Phan Nguyen 2020

Ngoc Phan Nguyen, Cheng Chao-Ling, Lin Yen-Kuang, Wu Ming-Shun, Chu Jan-Show, Tang Kung-Pei. (2020). A meta-analysis of students’ readiness assurance test performance with team-based learning. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02139-9

q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r2

Subgroup analysis of the meta-analysis comparing the nursing-only subgroup with the others subgroup; the nursing-only subgroup's "higher SMD of 2.368" came with reduced heterogeneity (I2 = 48%).

"the group that comprised only nursing students showed a higher SMD of 2.368, 95% CI = 2.05 ~ 2.6, pheterogeneity =0.14, and I2 = 48% (Fig. 3)."

Ngoc Phan Nguyen 2020 (2)

Ngoc Phan Nguyen, Cheng Chao-Ling, Lin Yen-Kuang, Wu Ming-Shun, Chu Jan-Show, Tang Kung-Pei. (2020). A meta-analysis of students’ readiness assurance test performance with team-based learning. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02139-9

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

The meta-analysis's formal test of subgroup differences between nursing-only and others subgroups was non-significant; the authors note the nursing-only subgroup contributed smaller numbers of studies and participants.

"There were no statistically significant subgroup differences (p = 0.1 in Fig. 4). However, smaller numbers of studies and participants contributed data to the nursing-only subgroup than to the others subgroup"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.