Claims

Objective support was not significantly correlated with utilization of support or prosocial behavior

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Objective support showed no significant correlation with utilization of support or with prosocial behavior in this sample. → Fu W 2022

Evidence

Fu W 2022

Fu W, Wang C, Chai H, Xue R. (2022). Examining the relationship of empathy, social support, and prosocial behavior of adolescents in China: a structural equation modeling approach. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01296-0

q3 · i? · associational · r1

Pearson correlation analysis of the three social support dimensions (Table 3) in the 1171-adolescent survey. The article reports "Objective support was not signi ficantly correlated with the utilization of support and prosocial behavior"; no effect size is printed, so equivalence was not tested.

"Objective support was not signi ficantly correlated with the utilization of support and prosocial behavior"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id objective-support-null-correlation-prosocial
title Objective support was not significantly correlated with utilization of support or prosocial behavior
description Objective support was not significantly correlated with utilization of support or prosocial behavior
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — fu-w-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.